The R351M has a metal case and built-in WiFi, and looks fantastic. It's worth noting that the R351P we reviewed had uneven levels of brightness and a dead pixel right on the left-hand side of the display (which thankfully didn't impact gameplay and was almost impossible to see unless we were playing in total darkness). However, the display isn't quite as punchy as the 3.5-inch panel seen on the Retroid Pocket 2, which, while being brighter and more colourful, also boasts a higher resolution of 640 x 480. The R351 has a 3.5-inch IPS screen with a resolution of 320 x 480 pixels, which makes it ideal for running pretty much any console which launched before the HD era took off.
The nature of obtaining ROMs online is naturally quite a grey area, and we'd recommend you source your games legitimately, either using ROM-dumping devices or turning your own CDs into ISOs, rather than using sites online. So which is best? There's only one way to find out.Įditor's note: It's worth pointing out that neither of the machines featured here come with any ROMs loaded as standard. The Anbernic R351 and Retroid Pocket 2 are two very similar machines with the same focus, but the way they look, feel and operate is more different than you might imagine. We've covered quite a few of these on the site – including the Pocket S30, RK2020 and BittBoy – but more recently, two examples hit the market and caused more of a stir than most.
As portable technology has progressed over the past decade, we've seen a host of gaming handhelds that don't run physical games but are instead focused on emulation, replicating the performance of consoles like the Game Boy, SNES, Mega Drive and even Nintendo 64.
0 kommentar(er)
